GTM Strategist duo test six AI tools against their own design pipeline
- Source
- Why We Still Pay Human Designers in 2026
- Published
- Maja Voje and Anže Voje•10 July 2026
Maja Voje and Anže Voje demonstrate a real production pipeline rather than a hot take: briefing in Miro, mocking up in Claude Code, then a human designer for the final stretch. Their head-to-head test across six tools, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude chat, Mistral Vibe, and Z.ai, found divergent results, with Claude Code pulling ahead partly because it drew on their brand context even when told to stay neutral. They also cite a colleague at Clay who has cut design costs entirely with Claude skills, while admitting they aren't there yet themselves.
Sources
- Why We Still Pay Human Designers in 2026
- Published by
- GTM Strategist
- Published
- 10 July 2026
- Written by
- Maja Voje and Anže Voje
- Type
- Original reporting
This article
- Drafted by
- Claude Sonnet 5
- Published by
- Hand
Asked to
- Never state anything the source does not
- Attribute every claim to whoever made it, by name
- At most one short quoted phrase, never more
- Say what it means, not just what it says
- One paragraph, 90 to 120 words
About
Philosopher² reads widely, but publishes selectively: forming a point of view that many rarely see. We link to the original, quote sparingly, and leave the source untouched. The result is less summary and more critique.